<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A short preview of Google Gadgets for Linux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ubuntudaily.com/2008/06/04/a-short-preview-of-google-gadgets-for-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ubuntudaily.com/2008/06/04/a-short-preview-of-google-gadgets-for-linux/</link>
	<description>Your Daily Dose Of Ubuntu Linux</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 11:37:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chin</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntudaily.com/2008/06/04/a-short-preview-of-google-gadgets-for-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-3225</link>
		<dc:creator>Chin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntudaily.com/?p=62#comment-3225</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Do you know how to add gadgets that do not appear in the browser? For example, I was looking for a sticky notes gadget but could not find one. On a Google site, I found something called MultiNote that would do the job, but how do I get Google Gadgets to read in the downloaded file (MultiNote.gg)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Do you know how to add gadgets that do not appear in the browser? For example, I was looking for a sticky notes gadget but could not find one. On a Google site, I found something called MultiNote that would do the job, but how do I get Google Gadgets to read in the downloaded file (MultiNote.gg)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yannick</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntudaily.com/2008/06/04/a-short-preview-of-google-gadgets-for-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-3056</link>
		<dc:creator>Yannick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntudaily.com/?p=62#comment-3056</guid>
		<description>well, not too memory hungry... less than the windows version (cause there isn&#039;t any search until you install that too)...

you can get a fair amount of gadgets running for under 50 MB of RAM... also the performance is very good... of course it depends how the gadgets are coded, but all of them I use are good with the recourses</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, not too memory hungry&#8230; less than the windows version (cause there isn&#8217;t any search until you install that too)&#8230;</p>
<p>you can get a fair amount of gadgets running for under 50 MB of RAM&#8230; also the performance is very good&#8230; of course it depends how the gadgets are coded, but all of them I use are good with the recourses</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fr33d0m</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntudaily.com/2008/06/04/a-short-preview-of-google-gadgets-for-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-3043</link>
		<dc:creator>Fr33d0m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntudaily.com/?p=62#comment-3043</guid>
		<description>But the question about this is:
How memory hungry are the gadgets?  We run *nix because we want a nice lightweight OS that can do everything we need it to.  If the gadgets just bog it down, then what would be the point.  I&#039;m sure the gadgets run and look great but what is the point of all of that if we could just do anything they do without them and using half the resources.  I am going to go get them to put on my PCLinuxOS box as well as my Gentoo box to see how well they run.  I guess only time will tell on if Google&#039;s effort will be worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the question about this is:<br />
How memory hungry are the gadgets?  We run *nix because we want a nice lightweight OS that can do everything we need it to.  If the gadgets just bog it down, then what would be the point.  I&#8217;m sure the gadgets run and look great but what is the point of all of that if we could just do anything they do without them and using half the resources.  I am going to go get them to put on my PCLinuxOS box as well as my Gentoo box to see how well they run.  I guess only time will tell on if Google&#8217;s effort will be worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntudaily.com/2008/06/04/a-short-preview-of-google-gadgets-for-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-3041</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntudaily.com/?p=62#comment-3041</guid>
		<description>Wow, you earn exactly... €0.00 more than I do! Lucky prat!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, you earn exactly&#8230; €0.00 more than I do! Lucky prat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.488 seconds -->
